My view of health care in Alberta

by Mark Zaugg 10. December 2010 21:15

I know that Sue Huff is going to release the Alberta Party's view on health care soon.  Given that it's such a hot issue in this province, I wanted to get my thoughts out ahead of her (I hope) and see just how they correlate.  

I am not a health care administrator.  I am not a doctor or a nurse.  I do not manage a hospital or health care facility.  I do not work for Friends of Medicare, nor do I work for any form of private medical services.  I do not meet with the minister of health, although I most certainly like his stylish and jaunty last name.  I'm occasionally a patient - I'm currently recovering from another round of antibiotics that fixed a lung infection - and otherwise just a plain ol' typical Albertan.  Most of the view I have of the system comes entirely from without and via what I can obtain through the media.  

Let's not forget, I'm not normal.  Normal people, so I'm told, don't write 3000 word epistles on their opinions.  So I'd like to think that I'm a little more tuned in to the issue than the average person.  But I'm no expert.

I'm not quite sure where this is going to lead me, so I'm going to put this paragraph in now and hopefully I'll catch it while I'm proof reading.  If I missed deleting it, what you're reading now is a reminder to myself to give a quick synopsis of the points I want to raise - almost as if this entry was planned.  Things that I know I want to hit are the superboard and the necessary side trip regarding Mr. Duckett.  I want to address emergency rooms and that sends me down a necessary side trip to talk about Dr. Sherman.  I want to talk about long term facilities, then family doctors, and that missing piece I haven't put together yet.  If I get that far, I want to talk a bit about the heart and the soul and if anyone gets that far they're a bigger geek than I am.  

The Sooper Superboard

How can I possibly cover this in a few paragraphs?  It could nearly be a week's worth of blogs as a sooper topic all on it's own.  In an attempt to reform our health care system, the government dissolved the nine regional boards which were supposed to have consolidated all the smaller regional boards around the province.  This was how the government was going to show us leadership on health care in Alberta..  It did consolidate everything to a central command and control, but I think that (Minister at the time) Liepert's statement that amalgamation wouldn't directly affect health professionals or patients was... let me be extremely charitable and say it proved to be incorrect.  Alternative viewpoints would be to call it, on my more cynical days, a "bald-faced lie" and on my less cynical days I'd say it was "clearly and presumptuously an overly optimistic and unrealistic assumption to make."

In case I haven't been blunt enough, we hadn't had time to fully resolve consolidating to nine regions and it was utter folly to disrupt the system once again.  Dissolving the Alberta Cancer Board, Alberta Mental Health Board and AADAC are on my list of ideas that never made any sense whatsoever to me - and they are where some of our most critical issues lie today.  This is the shining example of the government dinking around in the back end way too often to the detriment of the whole system.  Could they waste more time and money addressing the wrong issues?  I think it would be a challenge.

I think that amalgamation has proven to be a poor idea, but I think the problem is equally about how it was handled.  No good can ever come from tipping the table on it's side in order to clear it off.  There wasn't planning, there wasn't foresight, it was just a way to get rid of nine regional political problems with deficits and replace them with something more government friendly and "willing to change."  Different standards of care depending on which side of the road you live on is never going to change - we've just moved the affected roads once again - in this case it's the border.  That has nothing to do with overall care.  That's what makes amalgamating boards twice in a row such a horrible idea.


So what did we get for our effort?  Clearly we have an AHS board set up on the presumption of being able to do imaginative and innovative reforms of the system that is held under the government's thumb via the health minister.  At this stage I'm apoplectic over what they actually do.  Hey, board members, tell me what your plans are or I'll fire you!  Waitasec...  they aren't even accountable to me and the rest of the citizens of Alberta.  This is terrible.

The firing of Steven Duckett demonstrated just how much we're paying to a board that appears redundant since everything is being run by the minister anyhow.  

Look, I'm just a guy out here in the real world.  I can get fired two ways:  "with cause" and "without cause".  Fired with cause means I get a "Don't let the door hit you on the way out."  Fired without cause we talk severance.

When Mr. Duckett (yeah, I know he's a "Doctor" but I want to differentiate between MD's who deserve the esteem) was fired he walked off with more money than I'll see in the next ten years.  This sets up an interesting situation.  If he was fired "With cause", his cookie crumbling, why is he getting that kind of severance?  If he was fired "Without cause" then just why the hell was he fired?

Now in my view, Mr. Duckett should have shown much more experience and class than he did.  As the head of the Superboard, I expect him to comport himself appropriately, to be experienced with speaking to the media and to deal competently in those situations.  He didn't and that's part of the job.  If my job was media relations and I screwed up like that, I'd expect my two weeks pay and be happy to have it.  However that's a pretty small slice of that job and I'm in no position to be able to judge how he performed in total.

I make a pretty average salary in Calgary.  Sure, my personal situation's bad right now, in part because of my poor choice in financial planners, but I will eventually recover.  If you're telling me we can't fill that position with someone competent for less than $575,000 a year I will tell you to your face I don't think you're competent hiring good staff.  What is that, roughly ten times the average Albertan's salary?  Did we get ten times the value?  We'll never know - they aren't accountable to us, the citizens.

So now that we're here, what do we do?  First, I actually feel we have to keep AHS as an entity.  We have to stop this endless cycle of administrative disruptions.  But we're going to fix a whole lot of the problems with a centralized authority by making it wide open and accountable.  Start by making their compensation public.  Ensure that minutes are made public and guidelines for redactions must be minimal, made public and rigidly adhered to.  Policies and reports are to be made public and available and must be written in plain language.

Did anyone know who a single one of the board members were before four of them resigned?  These are the people making choices on behalf of every last one of us.  We deserve to know who they are and demand they represent each of us fairly.  Every last person on that board that did not resign have the responsibility to make themselves, their views and their visions available to the citizens of Alberta.  Not just a few Albertans who know how to reach them.  If you represent us, address us all.  And be ready to take questions without waving a cookie.

-----

We have a real problem with wait times in emergency rooms.  Premier Stelmach, you're wrong.  If but a single person dies due to an extended wait in emergency, we have a crisis.  If a single person suffers ancillary harm because of a needless wait to get care, we are living in a crisis.  When the emergency room doctors fear that their patients are not getting adequate care and have told you so in no uncertain terms and they are not heard, you are part of the crisis.

A couple years back I caught pneumonia pretty bad.  I ended up in the emergency room at the Foothills hospital for a little over six hours before being admitted.  I felt almost ashamed when I finally saw the doctor.  I felt there were a lot of other really serious cases in there with me that needed attention before me, although I was very grateful once I had finally been admitted.  Listening to waiting times now, I hear it's only gotten worse.

Now it was just pneumonia and in my mind that doesn't normally require a visit to emergency, but in my case it was a bacteria that survived the first round of anti-biotics and came back with a vengeance.  It certainly changed my perspective of life when I later heard the term, "life-threatening" applied to that bout of pneumonia.  Some of the most horrifying news came after I started my recovery.  The nurse that asked out of the blue, "Did they ever find the cancer, dearie?"  Huh?  Nonono, it was just pneumonia.  Wasn't it?  I felt best when my specialist (Dr. Van Olm - another jewel of a doctor) told me, "You'll recover fully, but you'll never be quite the same."

No, I will never be the same.  I took up my broom and slider and started curling again to keep active in the winter.  I started riding my bike again in the summer.  It certainly played a role in breaking up with a girlfriend who smoked.  The first sign of an infection has me back at my doctor's doorstep - two years on and I know I remain vulnerable.  I've taken responsibility to achieve better health.  I'm not healthy yet, but I'm trying.

Who's taking responsibility for our emergency system's health?  It's not healthy yet, but Dr. Raj Sherman speaks up and is trying and he gets shut down, kicked out of caucus and disparaged by his peers.  He has not been recognized by his former party as the hero that the majority of the province sees from him.  Who is out of touch, us or them?


The problem in emergency comes from various pressures.  We know for certain that there is a serious lack of long term beds in Alberta right now - and we have an aging population that does not bode well for the immediate future of our health care system.  Don't we?  Or is Alberta the land of the young, up and coming population where dreams are made and lifestyles are healthy?

I know I'm getting sold a bill of goods when we can't even keep our narrative straight anymore.

Clearly we need long term beds right now.  It may be an ephemeral need, it may be a permanent need.  But we need more in place.  Given that it may or may not need to be permanent, this is a perfect opportunity to be looking for acceptable facilities which could modularly be turned into what we need.  I know we don't want long term beds to be too clinical, but perhaps an aging hospital could be made "homier" just to tide us through.  The Calgary General Hospital is perfe-- wait, we blew it up.

Don't build a palace that will be empty or razed in twenty years.  Let's start with what we have today.  It's not going to be perfect, but it has to be better than sitting in a chair in the emergency room.

The other part of the problem is the unconscionable lack of family doctors.  I will declare right here and now to the rest of the world that I, in the most literal sense of the phrase, owe my very life to Dr. Gordon Melling.  (And I love you too, Nurse Sharon.)  You can't have him, he's too busy as it is.  :-)  It's because he's such a great family doctor.  Why don't my children have a great family doctor?  Why don't all Calgarians?  It's inexcusable and part of the reason people are ending up in emergency instead of seeing a great doctor first.

A walk in clinic has it's place, but it's not the same as the doctor that knows our personal history and is in tune with us as individuals.  Dr. Melling noted that the only time he's seen me lately is when I've been coughing.  Yessir, I get the hint, I'll be in for a check up around my birthday.

Did we not all learn the idiom, "A stitch in time saves nine"?  How about "Pay a little now or a lot later"?  Let's address the problems before they become emergencies.  


There's a missing piece with emergency rooms - or possibly more, I don't really know.  I'm not the expert, but I know that if the solution was as simple as adding long term beds and family doctors we'd have a damned easy puzzle to solve and that just comes across as too much of a silver platter answer.

I don't know the solutions, but I certainly spot problems.  I may not have the answers to our health care crisis, but maybe I can figure some of it out.  Just by chance I may spot something around me that some AHS board member in Toronto doesn't have access to.

The biggest problem with the emergency rooms and Alberta Health Services and the Ministry of Health and Wellness is that it's all somebody else's problem.  We, the citizens, are not being treated as citizens.  We're being treated like spoiled children who are only grasping votes that have to be teased from our hands.  It's our health - we need to be in charge here.

Our health care crisis urgently needs two things:  
1.  Honest real consultation with all Albertans and
2.  A genuine perspective of our situation.

The perspective will inherently stem from the conversation we have during the consultation.  We don't have time for yet-another-year-long-province-wide-steam-whistle-bring-your-axes-for-grinding-health-care-reform-tour.  Just start talking and listening and put real data on the table.  When the Raj Shermans start speaking out, that's the time for the politicians to shut the hell up and listen.  The doctors have the most knowledge, the patients have the most at stake, the politicians need to stop being a road block through their efforts to reform the system.

Regardless of what I said above, I know for a fact that although we have some localized health care crises, our health care system is not locked in crisis.  We have some of the most exceptional, caring, intelligent health care professionals anywhere right here in this province.  They have to be, because you're not going to last long in Alberta unless you are willing to hang your dedication on your sleeve.  The perspective is what will strike the balance between the Premier's crisis denial tactic and the problems we all perceive.

We need tangible information out here that says:
- "You know what, cancer rates are up an extra ten percent, but seventy percent of patients can recover with adequate treatment.  A new cancer centre would make a big difference and extend a lot of lives."  Or
- "Perhaps we only need one state of the art cardiac facility to deal with the really serious issues, and the rest of the province is okay with the emergency care."  Or
- "Maybe we want children born in rural hospitals so we can keep moms closer to home, but we have a really fantastic neonatal unit centralized (in Red Deer, of course) when we need it."  Or
- "Our nurses are working way too much overtime, we could hire 5% more just in what we're paying in overtime."

I don't know what that conversation sounds like yet.  We can't even have these discussions because we aren't deemed worthy of that kind of information.  Read everything I've ever written.  Do I not sound like the person you can have a serious, reasoned conversation with?

-----

The heart and the soul of health care is..  what?  

The doctors, nurses, technicians, ambulance drivers, cleaning staff and all the people who protect our health?

The patients who get better - or not - in the care of our system?

I think we can all agree that it's not a board of bureaucrats, but those bureaucrats have to have a huge amount of heart and soul just to be willing to sit on the board.

Whatever it is, I don't feel that the government has devoted their full heart and soul towards improving the health care system.  We're not having the conversations we need to have.  We've wasted too many years purporting to support the principles of the Canada Health Act - but we're going to do it a Third (somewhat nebulous and undefined) Way.  We've had the ultimately failed Health Resources Centre experiment and messed around with what we eventually pulled back under the umbrella (sorta) anyways.  We spent way too much time messing around with administrative boards and spent far too little time letting the administrators actually running the show we've entrusted them to do.

We have collectively decided as a society that the Canada Health Act is what we want and shall not be contravened.  We need a government that will support that decision and not keep looking for these loopholes that let our system get nibbled to death by ducks.

I want to see that we are dedicating ourselves - heart and soul - into improving what we've got.  Enough trying to continually reform it.  Let's sit down and have some honest, grown up discussions about what we have, what we need and where we want to go.  That way we can stop arguing about whether we should use the word crisis and instead discuss possible solutions we can find together.  It starts with the Ministry opening up a little - no, a lot - and bringing the conversation to all of us.

At no point did I ever say we're problem free and living in public health care happy land.  We're facing major issues.  But how dare we even have a public vs. private conversation when we can't even address the system that's in place today?  We need that conversation first.

Disenfranchisement

by Mark Zaugg 6. December 2010 00:21

You guys know I normally go months on end without posting anything, right? 

I went down to Melrose Cafe for Third Tuesday's event: "Election Dissection: The role of social media in Election 2010 Calgary" 

A couple of points worth mentioning.  Apparently I've become part of the "usual crew."  That doesn't sound like me at all.  Which is a point worth discussing all to itself. 

I mentioned the conversation between Naheed and I at Civic Camp 3D in twitter.  Essentially it was:

Nenshi: So have I pretty much ruined your life?
Me:  Yeah.
Nenshi:  Glad to hear it!

It is very much true.  I came out of the election differently than I went in.  It's more than feeling I can enact positive change.  It's more than being willing to throw out my opinion.  It's more than just saying I'm engaged and determined to stay that way.  All of that is true, but I feel there are intangibles that I don't have a grip on yet.  It's attitude, it's determination, it's a new level of understanding of myself.

Of course, tonight I also learned I'm not normal, but we all knew that anyways.

-----

The point I want to discuss came from sitting with Andrew McIntyre and Brian Singh.  Andrew and I were talking provincial politics, particularly in light of me joining the Alberta Party over the weekend. 

One of the things that came up was a woman complaining about being disenfranchised for 20 years.  Then Naheed Nenshi wins the mayoral election and suddenly she feels enfranchised again.

That's not the same as being disenfranchised.  That's simply a matter of being on the losing end of the election for 20 years.  I hold a substandard opposition to blame for that.  The cure for it is to improve the entire opposition.  The cure is a re-evaluation of policy and revamping the way to communicate with the public at large.  It hasn't happened in 40 years.  It's way past due.

But there was something bothering me all the way home.

I feel strongly that the government has not been listening to all Albertans.  Public consultation has not been broad enough or in depth enough.  I have not been part of the inside, I don't know what it's really been like.  But there has clearly been a problem with a closed and defensive caucus.

I feel that the government has been ideologically driven for 20 years.  I believe the government has been arrogantly thinking they could do no wrong and have an entitlement to rule.  Granted, it's only my impression and my opinion need not be shared.

However I know that when I approached my MLA and the appropriate minister, my issue was rebuffed out of hand as irrelevant, that I was in the wrong, that there was nothing wrong with the policy or law no matter how unjust I feel it is.

And there is my disquiet.

When a government has been in place for so long as to become inherently arrogant, closed and non-communicative they cease to represent the citizens and begin to become self-serving instead.  Regardless of how well intentioned or talented or big hearted our representatives individually may be.  Issues of the day cease to become as important as retaining the status quo.  Regardless of how important or unfair or inequitable the issues individually may be.

Governments that do not listen to it's citizens do, in fact, become disenfranchising.  They may not directly take away the right to vote, but a system that has become entrenched and only permits change in 40 year increments has, de facto, lessened the value of the opinions of an entire subsection of the population for a great period of time.  We reach the tyranny of the majority.

The government isn't going to simply change.  It is our responsibility to change the tenor of the debate and ensure that all voices receive a fair chance of being heard.  I know with certainty that is not happening right now.


We aren't disenfranchised.  But we lose the ability to be heard when the government has lost the ability to listen.  Like the municipal election, I have found where my views are best aligned and I will work with those that represent me.  But I'm not looking to form the next 40 year dynasty.  I'm looking to have a very open and rational discussion about the problems we face right now.

The Big Listen is the antidote to cynicism.  An open agenda where we agree upon priorities is the solution to hidden agendas.  Honest and forthright conversation is the base we build from.

This just may be the longest blog I've ever written in my life.

by Mark Zaugg 4. December 2010 00:48

It is inherently impossible to include all the ideas that culminate here.  Instead I have to pick and choose and summarize as best I can from the intricacies I've been able to tease in my mind for some twenty or thirty odd years. 

If you know my personality and my style, I'm not about to change now.  I've been that slightly irreverent, smart assed punk ready to crack a mildly funny, self deprecating joke each and every chance I can get and none of that is going to change any time soon.  Couched in the middle of that joke is meant to be a somber and serious thought - and make no mistake, I think long and hard about issues I care for passionately.  Some people like me, some people loathe me.  Both are okay by me -- so long as we can keep a degree of respect between us. 

I'm a guy that really hates to be pigeon holed, primarily because I have such a hard time categorizing myself and my own views.  I try really hard to be open minded and willing to change and adapt when faced with alternative facts, but I also try to stay steadfast and unwavering in my beliefs.  It's when the "steadfast" crashes into the "open-minded" that the little old hamster wheel in my head goes spinning out of control and I have to re-evaluate my views or opinions.  I've flipped opinion on some major issues through the course of my life and I'm continuing to learn along the way.  I'm a really smart guy, and most of what I learn teaches me just how little I know. 

I'm willing to bet that it's right at this point one or two of my good friends just figured out what I'm about to write about. 

-----

To describe me, you have to understand that I'm a prairie boy - a construct of Southern Albertee.  Although I'll point out I was born in Vancouver and therefore not a "real Albertan" and probably every bit an average Albertan since most of us tend to come from somewhere else.  Those who really want to understand me will know that my grit and fibre comes from the Palliser Triangle.  I grew up knowing bullshit comes from bulls and shouldn't come from people.  We don't shy away from any of it because it's just part of the life around us.  Don't throw it around, because you may just be living in it - spread it on the fields to fertilize next year's crop.  Water means irrigation and irrigation means crops and crops mean barley, wheat and canola.  Bow Island has beans and the good corn comes from Taber and the family farm we all came from seems mostly to be a memory.

I'm not from a farm, but I've always been around a farm.  I can plough a more-or-less straight line, I can swath, I can bale, I can combine - but you probably don't want to set me up on the new combine just yet.  I've run grain trucks plenty and I've manned a cattle run once as a kid during branding.

The good years of my childhood were in Rosemary, Alberta.  I best loved the small towns, but moving from Hanna to Calgary was one of the best things that happened in my life.  Sure, I was a bit of a rube in a city of somewhere around a ridiculous 600,000 people, but I had opportunity for the geek to bloom that just didn't exist in rural Alberta.  I liked the city - it gave me a chance to look not so screwball for liking school and finding new interests.

Makes me suffer a bit as the "Jack of all trades, master of none" but I've managed to scrape through.  And I've made myself laugh and amused the hell out of some friends along the way.

And right now, a couple of those friends are wondering if they were wrong above, and a couple others are dying for me to get on with it.

-----

My single favourite quote from Calgary's 2010 municipal election was Naheed Nenshi talking about the crazy mix that makes up him and the crazy mix that makes up Calgary.  I am most definitely part of that crazy mix and consist of a wild mix in and of myself.

I'm a little rural, a little urban.  My head's in the stars, my feet are on the ground.  I'm an uber-geek and my daughter hates it when I "geek out with the computer talk" but I'm conversant and knowledgeable on a wide range of topics.  I'm just shy and hate small talk.  I am my own brand of crazy mix as you are your own brand of crazy mix and there's something there that I find interesting.  We may like or dislike each other, but I'm interested in what you've got in your makeup that can change and improve me as a person.

I've got problems in my life I need help to address.  If you've got a solution, we ought to at least try to find a way to talk about it and see how we can manage.  Homo sapiens sapiens remains a social species and we best find a way to exist within a societal structure.

I believe that everything in life consists of compromise.  There are no black and white answers, and any time someone hands me a "silver platter" answer it is - invariably - wrong in some sense.  The proper answer is neither black or white.  Life is complex, I am complex, you - the reader - are far more complex to simply pigeon hole you into a simplistic and formulaic category.  We need to talk and to listen, observe the issues, discover possibilities, discuss ideas going forward and negotiate and compromise our priorities to tackle.

Together we are a composition of that crazy mix.  Our individual mixes must find a way to structure together to make a crazy mix that is our city, our country.

I like this crazy mix - even the parts I'm not all that fond of.

-----

I went through university in the late 80's and a bit in the early 90's.  In the time I went through I saw tuition rise substantially and in my view the quality of education dropped substantially through the years.  We voiced our concerns professionally and unprofessionally, appropriately and inappropriately.  It made no difference in the long haul.

Those were the years of the 5 percent cut across the board.  Don't you see?  The government had consulted with Albertans and that was what we wanted.  I felt really cheated because I'd been trying to speak for years and what I wanted never seemed to come up in the conversation.  It felt like I hadn't been heard at all.  Now don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of balancing the budget and being fiscally responsible.  I'm not entirely convinced that taking 5% across the board was the best approach to take - and I'm certain that it hurt more in some areas than in others.  To this very day I think we continue to pay the price on some of the horrible decisions made back then.

They were the years of the ideological black and white answers.  For us or agin us - and there was no room in the middle.  There was a whole lot of consultation with Albertans, but it amounted to a whole lot of talking at me and not any listening to what I was concerned about.  I'd been left on the outside looking in.

Over the ensuing years I've felt more isolated.  I've seen poor choices made in education, in health care, in resource management, in budgets, in environmental stewardship, in riding alignment, in royalties, in strange rulings from the speaker of the house; I've got issues with a significant number of choices our government has taken over the past twenty years.  And I'm not happy about it.  The opposition has been pathetic in my view - failing to hold the government accountable for their poor choices, failing to present alternative and better ideas, failing to create interest and generate political excitement.  

Alberta has not always been like this.  Alberta has had more than it's share of great opposition personalities.  It's pretty hard to live in Alberta and not know the names Grant MacEwan, Grant Notley, Lawrence Decore, Sheldon Chumir.  I could never figure out why Kevin Taft never gained more traction.  Lately I've been disappointed with both sides of the legislature - and I don't believe the present opposition problems stem from David Swann or Brian Mason.  It's a bigger issue than just swapping out the leader.

I've voted for a lot of different people and parties over the years.  I became uncomfortable with the PC's during the Getty years, I was lost once the Klein years came.  I have knowingly cast a futile vote against the Tories since 1993.  I don't want to vote against the government, I want to vote for the people and ideas I support.

-----

After saying I don't like to pigeon hole myself, I usually get lumped as a Red Tory.  I am very fiscally conservative, but in general I have a progressive social viewpoint.  I just do not line up well on a left and right scale - I pick and choose the best from where it lies.

Anyone trying to fix me in place based on the mayoral candidates I liked probably had a conniption.  I made my choice after hard thought on my own standards - it's hard to find a common theme based on policy.  What is the common theme was that my primary choices proved to be good communicators who declared a clear sense of direction that lined up with my values.  I always stated I'd be happy with someone I clearly disagreed with who could engage me with clarity.

The election was great for me, I felt genuinely excited to be part of something so interesting and vibrant.  It's something that sadly can never happen in Alberta on a provincial level, though.  After the city election I was asked if I was looking forward to the provincial election - I said no, I didn't expect any changes for the better provincially and I had no interest fighting a futile battle.

-----

We have no room for anything outside of the big tent in Alberta.  At least that's the way it has been for the past 40 years.  But I've been frustrated with a government that is not fiscally conservative enough for me and has been reprehensible in it's actions towards programs such as AISH.  There just hasn't been a place where I could fit into the poltical spectrum here.

The fumbling of the Stelmach government has not only turned me off, but it's turned off thousands of other Albertans.  I've welcomed the rise of the Wildrose Alliance.  They are a terrible fit for me, and I am a terrible fit for them, but they're bringing debate and a better home for some of the more socially conservative friends and family of mine.  Initially my hope was that the PC party would be free to take more of a centralist stance and be more open to policies I'm comfortable with.

Instead I've seen the most blithering arrogance I could imagine.  This has really come to a head over the past month.  It is unacceptable to hear the premier state there is no health care crisis while there so clearly are major problems which have consistently been raised by the ER doctors.  I'm disgusted with the "Distracted Driving" law.  The law itself is a distraction and can only be ineffective and unenforcible since we already have laws about driving without due care and attention which should be enforced now.  The last thing we need are more ineffective laws on the books.

We've seen meddling with AHS - an unelected, unaccountable and apparently grossly overpaid body that the government doesn't even trust to do the job that the superboard has been entrusted to do.  When the number of health boards was reduced to nine regional health authorities and did not produce the expected results, it was pure folly to amalgamate everything to one and expect a better result.

The unforgivable for me, however, should be very clear from my stance from Calgary's mayoral election.  I stand whole heartedly for open debate, defining issues and clarifying the vision that lies ahead.  The government has such a clammy, white knuckled grip right now their hands are numbed, but clearly so is their outlook because for all their attempt to control the spin it's so clearly coming undone.

The Tories sad mishandling of Raj Sherman's criticism stands as the issue which will bury the PC party to me forever.  It is completely unacceptable to me to quash open conversation.  This is a very important issue, it needs to be discussed openly and publicly and we all deserve to make an informed decision.  Burying debate wrapped in caucus confidentiality shows the paternalistic, arrogant, bullheaded attitude of a simplistically ideological party too long in power and out of touch with the populace.  This isn't just a government not listening to me, this is now a government only listening to their own droning and shutting out any outside noise.

It's not just urbane city folk.  Friends who have more of a handle on the rural side tell me they're tired of it, too.  Tired of underused hospitals, tired of being pawns, tired of being taken for granted, tired of talking and not being heard.  Kinda the same as those city slickers, eh?

As far as I'm concerned, Klein separated me from the Tories, but Stelmach has destroyed the PC brand in my mind every bit as badly as Trudeau has destroyed the Liberal brand in Alberta.  I know those are strong terms and I know that many will argue with me vociferously.  To those I say, "Wonderful.  Let's have that argument.  Let's have it openly and publicly.  Let's have that discussion in full sentences and leave room for nuance and subtlety, negotiation and compromise."

-----

I was interested when The Big Listen began.  It was pretty interesting to see the process unfold.  I was cynical that it would come to anything more than public consultation had brought from the Tories in the past.  I've listened favourably to news of Reboot Alberta and eventually the Alberta Party.

Just prior to the Alberta Party's policy convention weekend, I was asked if I was going to attend.  "No, I don't really have the time or the money or was I even slightly interested in joining the Alberta Party."  I've never been a member of a political party in my life, nor do I ever intend to join one now.

"You don't have to be a member to attend."

Huh?  Seriously, what?  That was unheard of.  A policy convention where anyone can participate?  It's not even "pay to play"?

News came fast and furious that weekend and became more and more interesting.  People I've grown to know and trust from the municipal election have become involved with the Alberta Party.  Policy that I can support and believe in started to be established.  I don't necessarily agree with everything, but disagreements are not squelched, they're discussed and acknowledged.  Not everything is fleshed out as fully as I wish, but the work is ongoing and I'm willing to share the load.

We need an open and accountable government.  We deserve to have adult conversations and informed debate.  It's time for a change.  Calgary demonstrated that we can affect positive change around us.  The budget that was passed proved that a new approach can be effective and beneficial to us all.

The issues I wish to raise are going to require serious, in depth conversation and not sound-byte politics.  Scapegoats are not an option.  Paternalism is not an answer.  We need some grown up solutions.

I am determined to stay engaged and not fade away.  We will raise the level of debate and through debate return to better ideas of a better Alberta.  We deserve so much more than we are getting now.

After I post this, I'm filling out that membership I claimed I was uninterested in.  I've found my way out of the political wilderness and I have found my home again.  I am part of Alberta, Alberta is part of me.  It's time to talk and to listen in a meaningful way.

Making a Better Calgary

by Mark Zaugg 20. November 2010 00:38
I decided that I needed to spell out what I see as my objectives for #BetterYYC.  Some of them I have stated previously, other details may have only been implied or expressed through my action.  One of the things that spurred this was a conversation on twitter that I'd been hoping to have.  I've longed for a great example that demonstrated some of the side effects our efforts can create.  I've wanted to demonstrate how the smallest of actions can lead to major changes in our city.  I think I can show that better than ever now.  

The origins of @BetterYYC came about after Calgary's 2010 municipal election.  This may seem to be obvious today, but hopefully in five or ten years it will become somewhat clouded over with time.  It is a time of heightened interest and people who were previously detached finding new and interesting ways to engage with their city.  My hope with @BetterYYC is to both correct mistakes we have collectively made in the recent past and to re-establish what I believe to be heart of Calgary's identity from the years I've lived in this city and continue that spirit moving forward.  

The idea of Better Calgary did not originate from me and I happily admit I'm standing upon the shoulders of giants.  Many of our citizens have worked hard to create a better Calgary, just as many of our friends and neighbours continue to work very hard to make our city a better place to grow, to learn, to work, to retire, to explore, to enjoy and to live.  BetterYYC should not be considered new or innovative, it should be a recognition of the hard work so many others have established and an invitation for all citizens to find other ways to contribute.

Calgary has been a growth city for as long as I've known it.  I grew up in rural southern Alberta and Calgary was the city we'd flock to for goods and services, but it is the people that make the city what it is.  In 1983, I moved to Calgary for good and was welcomed by friends.  Calgary is a welcoming city because for so much of our history we have needed good people to come and create the very city in which we live.  Every influx of immigration has created a new layer to the complexity and richness of the city and we show off our stripes like strata from a core sample.  Those who are surprised that we could elect a mayor such as Naheed Nenshi have not experienced the richness and diversity of Calgary and have not understood that we did not elect a Muslim immigrant, we elected one of our own who completely believes in our city as we believe it in ourselves.

Unconstrained or undirected growth creates problems and Calgary has been subjected to some and avoided others.  We are not a city of gated communities and ghettos, we are a city where no one cares who your father was but remains interested in your talents and abilities.  We are a city where crime has sometimes become a serious problem, but a city where beat cops can make a huge difference through acting responsibly firm and helpful.  We are a city that is struggling with unconstrained growth on the fringes and we collectively are demonstrating a capability of having in depth and decisive conversations about how best to address our issues of logistics, transportation, schools and hospitals.

We are educated and industrious.  We want great people to come and share our city because we have great things to accomplish.  We bristle at PhD holders driving taxis, we desperately want our citizens to live up to their potential.  We want schools that will teach our children the skills they need to thrive in the world we are creating for them.  We have boundless opportunity around us, we don't want people to be homeless and on the sidelines - we want them involved and succeeding and participating in the bounty of our society.  

We are human, and with humanity comes imperfection and mistakes and those so-called cracks in our system.  Each one of those can be treated as an opportunity to improve something around us.  Every last one of us has a sphere of influence where we can act to make a difference in the world around us.  There is an immediacy to our actions that may have an impact, but there is also a longer term effect.  The stated long term goal of all my actions is to make my city - Calgary - a better city.

I have four premises I'm building from.

  1. You must be observant and recognize things around you which can be improved.
  2. You must care enough about your city and the issues you spot to want to act.
  3. You must create positive change by following through with action over your concerns
  4. You must share your story with others to create inspiration and gain new ideas.

The actions and the problems around you are entirely personal and the choice must be yours to make.  There are people out there doing hundreds of things each and every day that makes Calgary better.  There are people who have literally devoted their lives to it.  For them it is simply a choice of being aware of one specific task, following through and talking about it.  Some days it's a huge job just to find that one thing and you really have to go out of your way.  It isn't a contest, there's not an exam, it's a responsibility you take upon yourself.  You can't pass, you can't fail, you can't do it all, just please find one opportunity around you and act upon it.

The things to accomplish are vast and varied.  I often talk about picking up a bag of garbage because it is a big bugaboo of mine and there is ample opportunity for me in my neighbourhood.  I'm impressed with the difference I've made, but there is much more to be done.  We have awareness to be raised, charities to support, people to teach and to mentor.  Every choice you make can improve Calgary - make a choice purposefully and act to make a positive change.

- Rake up your leaves and the leaves don't clog the sewer and the runoff flows properly and we don't need to call out a city crew to fix it so often saving you tax dollars so the taxes can be redirected to a school which teaches a kid who grows up to make a good income and become a good citizen.

- Shovel your walk so your mailman doesn't slip so he considers your neighbourhood a plum route so he wants to keep it and makes sure you get great service.

- Pick up the garbage on the green area so when the city comes to mow they don't hit that smashed car part and damage the blade and have to spend extra shop time getting it repaired and sharpened.  In return, you can pick entire pieces of garbage instead of garbage that's been shredded by a mower blade.

That's the little stuff we can all do.  There are things we can do that are less tangible and no less important.  

The conversation I referred to at the top was about annoyance with the HAWCS helicopter and subsequently with an elitist attitude from the city police.  It's hard to present an involved argument within 140 characters and retain full clarity, but this is a beautiful example of how #BetterYYC can flounder or be successful.

The HAWCS helicopter is the very example of how one person, acting within their sphere of influence, can make a difference in the world and create a Better Calgary.  If you don't know the story, CPS Constable Rick Sonnenberg was struck and killed by a stolen car.  His sister worked tirelessly to create a memorial fund to purchase a helicopter.  I didn't think it was a good idea.  I argued we'd be better off with more cops on the street than one bird in the air.  "Why weren't we asking the cops about this?" I asked.  The reply I got was, "We did.  They wanted the helicopter."  QED.

The things we do to fix a problem will carry unintended consequences.  Some times they are going to be consequences we have to address.  We're not making a perfect Calgary, we're making a Better Calgary.  It's as simple as that.

So if the helicopter annoys you by waking you late at night, my challenge in return was to actually call the police, make a complaint and find out why HAWCS was circling overhead.

Someone - in reality a whole lot of other people - believed that getting Calgary a police helicopter made for a better Calgary.  A whole lot of people feel annoyed that we're woken up yet again by that blasted thing.  The very essence of #BetterYYC is to come together and have a meaningful conversation about what truly makes Calgary a better city and what needs to be done about it.  Let me run it through the steps above!

1.  Observe the effects of HAWCS.  How effective has it been with policing?  What are the consequences of having it fly?
2.  How much does the noise affect you?  It keeps me up later some nights and occasionally wakes me in the early morning.  I don't care enough to act, but someone else did.
3.  Call and complain.  Discover why it's up there.  Engage with the police and let them know of your concerns but also become aware of the situation around you.
4.  Discuss your concerns with your neighbours.  Maybe you need better lighting on your block.  Perhaps it was a one off emergency call you can't affect but you don't expect to repeat.  Become aware and share that awareness with the others who have been affected.

Lather.  Rinse.  Repeat.


BetterYYC is about finding problems that can and need to be addressed.  Then it requires action by either solving the problem, reporting the problem or forming a coalition of like minded people to solve the problem.  Afterward we must discuss the effects, what worked and what needs improvement.

BetterYYC is a daily process.  It touches every aspect of life in Calgary.  In words I love from a friend I now treasure, it's about embracing Calgary with your entire being.  It needs to be simple, attainable and focused towards positive change.  It is about engagement with our city.

Find how it fits into your life.  Take up the challenge and do one thing today to make your city better.

A #BetterYYC or a #BetterCalgary - so long as Calgary's better.

by Mark Zaugg 9. November 2010 00:43

One or two of you may know that I was the mover and the shaker, the power broker behind the beautiful face, the king maker that allotted the authority, influence and the might behind Calgary's municipal election. 

Even fewer will know that Mayor Nenshi regularly requests my advice on how to set policy. 

The irony is I may appear to be the smart assed class clown that only shoots off a joke from the back row, but in all honesty the previous statements are both overblown and true.  I did rally to the purple banner, I did make my opinion known and it did create positive results.  And there is no question that His Worship (I may be giggling when I write that) has stayed in touch with citizens after the election.  Hardly just me alone, but with all citizens of the city.  No, he and I are not bosom buddies, but one of these years when I least expect it he's going to reply to something either really cool or really inane that I have to say and that is an amazing feeling.  It's surreal to think that the Mayor is following me on twitter and has been for ages..

I really like the feeling that I accomplished something cool - something that I feel was better for Calgarians as a whole.  And that doesn't mean the work is done at all, but I've had an opportunity to not only express my views, but they have found a home with a lot of people who feel the same way I felt.  Including, but certainly not limited to, Naheed Nenshi.  So I've been happy to take up the challenge of some of those people I've come to trust and try to find a way to engage more with my city.

I'm participating with my community centre.  I'm paying attention to city hall.  I'm sending messages to our aldermen - although not my alderman, I'm still trying to figure out how I'm going to tackle that little issue.

My favourite idea to date was creating @BetterYYC.  The idea came from Nenshi's slogan, "Better Ideas, Better Calgary."  Because I believe those ideas really are better and will truly make for a better city.  And BetterYYC is just a more twitter style of brevity.

Credit for the basic idea comes from DJ Kelly.  "Take ownership to make the change, don't wait for permission."  Do something, do anything, just stay engaged and working on something within your sphere of influence to make better.  Don't overwhelm yourself, just find one thing you can do, then go do it.

I'm working on a couple of premises here:

  1. You have to observe your community.  Whether your block or the city as a whole, if you can't spot something that needs changed, you can't make a difference.
  2. You have to complain.  I don't talk much on this point, but if you're not complaining, you don't care enough to act.  But don't stop there...
  3. You have to actually perform an act of positive change.  Complaining about the situation means nothing unless you're willing to put your nose to the grindstone and put some effort into it.  Please note that I specify positive change.  Some things we do can have unintended consequences.  If we create new problems, they have to be acted upon as well.
  4. You have to talk about it.  Personally I hate talking about it.  I'm a private guy and I don't talk a lot about what I do.  We have to share our ideas and plan what's next.

I've been tweeting basic ideas of what I've been trying to accomplish.  I've retweeted good ideas I've run across from others.  I mean to be very non-judgmental about what makes a #BetterYYC -- if you think your action makes Calgary Better in a way that matters to you, that's good enough for me, we need to hear about it!  We can discuss it afterwards.  Also, please note that I can't do everything I post either.  I'm not Superman nor am I as wealthy as Bruce Wayne - but somebody can step up and do some of them and that would be great if it happened too.

 Now here's my conundrum.  (For city council -- noun: A confusing and difficult problem or question.)  Subsequent to the election, the Better Calgary Campaign has become reinvigorated and seems to be reactivating.  Or at the very least, it's getting more coverage to the point where I've become aware of it again.  Which makes sense because if they're going to be a watchdog on City Hall, they needed to wait for the election to finish and the new edition of city council to get back to work.

 I very much like the idea of Better Calgary.  I have heard of them before and although not personally involved (yet?) I certainly like their message of being engaged with what happens with municipal politics.  I have already expressed that I believe Better Calgary intersects with a large portion of what I want to accomplish with my #BetterYYC idea.

But I don't want to step on toes and I don't want to muddy the waters.  Or heaven forfend, obfuscate the purpose of what #BetterYYC meant to me in the first place.  Picking up a bag of garbage from your neighbourhood does not have a direct role with municipal governance, but it most certainly makes Calgary a better place to live.  I could change to #1GoodDeedYYC or something similar, but the opinions expressed today have been to carry on and stay with the short, inclusive hashtag.

Which leads to my second thought.  My unwritten rule, at least up to right now, is that if you state your idea to make Calgary a better place @BetterYYC you've gotten a Retweet.  And if I've stumbled across an idea I thought was pretty good, I'd RT that as well.  But if you don't tag #BetterYYC or #YYC in your tweet, you're relying on me finding it.  Unlike the perception I'm on twitter 24/7, I tend to glance over on occasion more than reading intensively these days.  Frankly, I'm just not that good at finding all the great ideas on my own.

Soooooo....

Be it proposed that @BetterYYC continue as #BetterYYC.
Be it proposed that the primary focus of #BetterYYC be broadly recognized as entailing any positive action that makes Calgary a better city in which to live.
Be it proposed that @BetterYYC will remain a place to RT ideas, actions and communication about how we as citizens make Calgary a better place to live.

Sound good so far?  One last question, should I retain my iron-fisted control of @BetterYYC or should I open up the account to others willing to abide by the basic premise and share the load?  It's no problem when people use the #BetterYYC hashtag - perhaps the solution is just generating more suggestions from you. 

In reality, the ultimate goal is to make Calgary better, and that responsibility is shared amongst us all.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

by Mark Zaugg 26. October 2010 09:07

So last night after the swearing in ceremony I'm standing around waiting for Brian Pincott to finish an interview so I can say hello and chat for a few minutes.  Suddenly I realize people around me are stretching necks and looking far more excited than usual.  Yesterday that meant one thing and one thing only and I had to smile knowing that Naheed was near. 

Sure enough, he walks up to me hugging and shaking hands and sharing congratulations along the way and he gets to me and...  turns and walks past me to thank a bunch of purple clad volunteers he recognized. 

My fault for not having the foresight to wash my purple shirt earlier, eh?  Congratulations, I'm somewhere in 1,080,000 people in Calgary he doesn't recognize.  Yay me, right? 

Not in the slightest.  I'm completely proud of what I did in this election.  And now the election is over, I'm getting this strange sense of a different direction I'm striking. 

I'm a huge fan of Naheed Nenshi, I'm a firm believer he is the right guy (tm) for this city at this time.  We needed his brand of sensibility and openness, his ability to explain his ideas and his capability of communicating with individual people and making them felt like they have finally, FINALLY been heard by someone.  I think his better ideas are, in fact, better for Calgary.  I believe he has the capacity to understand that the 14 people that were elected to city hall represents that crazy mix that is Calgary and it is going to take someone with a crazy mix to not just comprehend that, but to organize it all to keep it pulling in the same direction.

Transportation remains a headache in this city.  Secondary suites are a ridiculous mismash here.  The city audit really needs to be addressed and is only one of a thousand ways city hall could be more open and more responsive to us, the citizens.  These are things that need to be addressed, resolved and we need to move on with actually living our lives. 

I'm so pleased with the effort I put into the campaign for Naheed Nenshi and I have no doubt at all that I did, in fact, play some small part in creating this phenomenon in Calgary.  I helped to start the conversation, I helped to make it acceptable to consider this outsider to city hall, I helped with the traditional campaign of signs and door knocking and scruiteneering at the polls (okay, I probably did a lousy job there).  Will I do it again for Naheed?  Almost certainly, he's addressing what I feel needs to be addressed and he's more than clever and in tune enough to understand what needs to be addressed next as priorities change.  I'd also turn on a dime and campaign every bit as hard against him should he gut Calgary Transit or actively create a city council filled with acrimony.  Again, I don't see that happening in a million years.

I've been really blessed though my efforts campaigning with Nenshi for Mayor.  Yes, Nancy and Rachel, you've become two of my favourite people.  I'm so glad to have seen Lori, Marc, Wayne, Roy, James and Peter and I'm only just starting to know all the wonderful volunteers who I worked beside.  And every time Stephen walks past me he shakes my hand or slaps my back and I feel my efforts were completely understood and appreciated.  Everyone wants a slice of Naheed, I'm happy just knowing that I could do something that mattered.

After all that partisanship, I'm finding myself pulled more towards the fantastic work that Civic Camp did.  I'm really proud I went up to meet the CalgaryPolitics.com crew after being at Nenshi's downtown headquarters the night of the election.  I find myself looking towards the community association rather than city hall.  City council's in good hands - I helped put it there.  Now I think I want to go in a slightly different direction on my own.

For now, I'm working on making something better day after day.  Little stuff I can change.  No crying there.

#BetterYYC

by Mark Zaugg 19. October 2010 20:43

Just how wonderful was that? 

This week was seriously cool for me.  I feel like I actually did something.  I feel like the kids participated in something tangible and realistic.  And I don't feel like it's going to end here. 

So my thoughts last night were that Better Ideas really do make for a Better Calgary - a BetterYYC.  I truly believe that Nenshi's Better Ideas will get City Council and therefore the city back on track.  And through my efforts I helped to start the conversation within Calgary.  My attempt last night was to close the circle and more or less repeat how I announced I would be backing Naheed in the election.

Oh, no.  That's not good enough for DJ Kelly.  He's not going to accept the pleasant enough idea that I'm willing to pledge to work with our new council in order to get Calgary moving in the right direction.  He has to go raise the ante again.

DJ Kelly: Report to yourself. Take the ownership to make change. Don't wait for permission. @ @

I don't think there has ever been a day I've woken up in the morning and wanted to make Calgary worse.  But I've been annoyed with how much garbage collects along the 17th Avenue SE hill and did nothing about it.  I pass there four of every five days either riding my bike or walking up or down the hill.  I've grumbled about it, but nothing is ever going to change unless someone does it.  And clearly it hasn't been done often enough for my taste.  So, pledging to pick up a bag of garbage was nothing.

It very well may be a futile task as garbage continually blows along Blackfoot Trail, Deerfoot Trail, and 17th Avenue.  It's not about futility, it's about making a BetterYYC.  Somehow, in the smallest of ways.

-----

I listened to Naheed in the media today when they spoke of the Nenshi strategy to identify the hyper-involved people on social media and let us carry the message out.  I was involved, but certainly not hyper-involved.  Not until I felt snubbed at the Bow River Flow festival.  Then it became personal.  I really wanted a mayor that was going to work with everyone in council and get some better policy in play.  I feel almost used because I played along with the Nenshi strategy perfectly, but the Better Ideas are more or less my thoughts articulated in a much fuller way.

Initially I was skeptical that Naheed was sincere - wow, was that off the mark.  Then I was skeptical that Naheed could deliver.  Then I decided I had to become the change I wanted to see in the world and I had to pitch in.

We had some great choices in candidates this year.  Some were not for me, others were appealing for a whole number of reasons.  It was a tough choice and I took it seriously.  In the end, I picked who I thought was best for the right reasons.  Others made opposite decisions for what they thought was the right reasons.  The point of an election isn't that we're right or wrong.  Everyone gets to make their choice based on their own feelings.  The most votes win and we can trust in the strength of collective intelligence to hope we get where we want to go.  We will make mistakes - we have made mistakes - and we're going to be wrong about half the time.  But collectively, humanity has shown our outstanding ability to bring change around us.

Others had pitched in on their teams for the exact same reasons I chose Team Nenshi.  We all worked hard, we all did amazing.  I met amazing, passionate, smart, funny Calgarians.  I mentioned a few people I had new found respect for, but I genuinely mean I felt growing respect to so many people on #yycvote, those at the forums, and those who went door knocking.  This isn't about Team Nenshi anymore, it has become true for all of Calgary's citizens.

When I listened to Naheed's acceptance speech, I have to admit something he said touched me.

But in particular, I want to thank Ric McIver. If you had told me six months ago that I would have gained so much in respect, in admiration for this man, for everything he's done for this city, I'm not sure I would have believed ya. But I have. He has been an outstanding leader for this city and I hope that he will continue to be an outstanding leader for this city. Thank you.

He knows exactly what respect means to me.  That makes Better Politics in a BetterYYC.  In a significant way.

-----

A funny thing has happened while we've been discussing the narrative that the Purple Wave has caused around Calgary.

Let me start with me.  Wayne Stewart, let's get in contact and let's keep making Calgary a great city.  I completely want to work with you to do something to make a Better Calgary.  Big or small, it doesn't matter, I want to rally to your flag. 

That's not really news, though.

The second is an email from a very close friend.  "Thanks for helping to make a difference.   I'm not quite as gung-ho as you but you've got me thinking a bit about extracurricular time put into something to something."

The third is a tweet from one of the awesome people from Team Nenshi.


This isn't about doing something nice today and forgetting about it.  This isn't about doing something good every day for a couple of months and then letting it slide.  This is about making a BetterYYC forever.  In a powerful way.


She gets it.  That is what happens when you've become infected with the Purple Plague.  You want to become a better citizen in a BetterYYC.  We want to feel really proud about our city.  But remember, the Purple Plague comes in all colours of the rainbow.

-----

So I want people to talk about it.  This isn't trumpeting your own horn, it's about inspiring others to create their own Better Calgary.  Do something, do anything, that makes our city better in some way.  Go ahead, be idealistic for a while.  We've already made one "impossible" dream happen this week.  We can help by keeping up the momentum on positive change.

Take your kids to a park, be a snow angel to a neighbour, politely offer your seat on the bus, go volunteer at the food bank for a day.  Do all those things we normally do each and every day.  Just do one thing that's special and perhaps a little extra.  It's your choice, there aren't rules here.

My dream right now is to have two strangers on twitter enter the exact same tweet at the exact same time. 

Today I smiled at a stranger, and the stranger smiled back! #BetterYYC

Mayor Nenshi

by Mark Zaugg 19. October 2010 03:19

Honestly, I wasn't sure he was going to win. 

Honestly, I thought it was going to be the closest race for mayor I'd ever seen.

Honestly, tonight I said we were living in Recount City. 


I spent some time reading through my first posts.  The ones where I thought I'd take a cue from DJ Kelly and be more active in this election.  The ones where I realized that a broken city council was the biggest problem we faced.  The ones where I first realized my initial pick did not represent where I wanted Calgary to go.  The ones where I pondered how city council needed to get moving forward and stop getting high centered on speed bumps.  My early thoughts about what we needed in a mayor, council and ideas to move forward.  My earliest opinions on candidates.

The formative ideas when I was plotting my course.  How stupid was it when I said, "[Nenshi] will need every twitterer he can get to overcome 66% apathy."  Prophetic, perhaps?  That doesn't sound like me.

We're looking at over 50% turnout.  We're talking a lot of turnover in City Council.  I'm not sure all of it is for the better - the problem wasn't necessarily with the people but with their interaction.  We're talking a seismic shift as council swings to the right.  We're looking at an interesting future ahead.  Frankly, there's an unappetizing trial ahead left behind from the previous council, Nenshi's got his work cut out for certain.

And so I'll let my thoughts go back to where it started with me and ponder the Bow River Flow and let my thoughts be peaceful.  Let the ripples swirl in my mind to think, "We have allowed it to happen.  We have made it possible.  Now we have to turn it into something amazing."

It was a lot of work.  You're going to have to be a special candidate to make me want to do it all over again.

.@nenshi @chimaincalgary We've got a city to make better.  I'm on side.  To whom do I report tomorrow?

---

Many, many thanks to Lori and Roy and Rachel and Nancy and Ashley and James and Wayne and Stephen and Peter and hundreds of others on #TeamNenshi on twitter and the faces I recognized in the crowd but don't have names for.  This one's for all of you.

My Day in less than 15 minutes of typing.

by Mark Zaugg 17. October 2010 12:02

I woke up after staying up late to strike at the Music Club I volunteer with.  (Issue #1: Arts scene in Calgary)  Make a pot of coffee, catch up with a bit of #yycvote.  Rock skimming the pond detail today. 

I drive down to my Dad's in Ward 9 to pick up my kids. (Issue #2: Traffic and Issue #3: Too many improperly placed campaign signs)  We drive back home so I can shower, get addresses, and grab another cup o' goodness.  About to drive my kids down to do a course with Child Safe Calgary.  (Issue #4: Safe neighbourhoods)

I'm hoping to go door knocking.  I have to go from Lakeview to Palliser.  (Issue #5: Getting from Lakeview to Palliser)  Side tangent: I'll spare a thought that the exact same detour is the one we'll be facing in the NE without a traffic tunnel under the airport runway.  Have you listened to the complaints about traffic in the SW?  Do we need to repeat our mistakes with the tunnel?  (Issue #6: Airport Tunnel)

Back to my place to make dinner.  (Issue #7: Affordable housing / secondary suites)  After dinner I'm taking a nap, because tonight I'm working a casino in support of WP Puppets.  (Issue #8: More on the arts, but also funding via casinos, social justice, education in mathmatics)

This is what affects me on a daily basis.  C'mon, Naheed Nenshi, give me some answers.

Issue #1 = Better Idea 12
Issue #2 = Better Idea 5 and Better Idea 9
Issue #3 = Better Idea 6
Issue #4 = Better Idea 7 and Better Idea 11
Issue #5 = Better Idea 9, extra detail is here.
Issue #6 = Better Idea 4
Issue #7 = Better Idea 1
Issue #8 = Better Idea 10 and Better Idea 12.

I'm voting Nenshi.  He's addressing what affects me today.

Save Calgary Racing

by Mark Zaugg 17. October 2010 09:56

And you scraped my email from precisely where?

Strange that this is the first I have received an email from the Motorsport Council of Calgary.  I am certain that I have not given any consent whatsoever when my email address was collected that it would be used in this fashion.

Regardless of my support for Race City, my choice for mayor must certainly go beyond a single issue.  My choice for mayor will consider what is best for Race City as well as what's best for the rest of Calgary at large. 

I feel the future of Race City should be secure when negotiated openly - using the land as a race site is much preferable to me than using it as landfill.  Race City itself is a facility that is valued and respected in Calgary for it's longstanding history of driver education and a safe facility for high performance driving.  I fully think that should be able to stand on it's own merit.  Keeping Race City profitable is a matter of it's owners and supporters, not the citizens of Calgary at large.

I don't think Naheed Nenshi is going to hand Race City a gold plated guaranteed future, but neither will he shut it down compliments of a "...bullying city administration that doesn't work with private business [Race City] to solve the problems and find a new facility and keep motorsports going in this city."  (CivicCamp 2010 Mayoral Forum.)  The solution with Race City is to give it the opportunity to survive.  We don't need Ric McIver for that, we need a public discussion about the benefits of having a safe venue for high performance driving.  I remain anxious to be part of that conversation, I'm certain we can hold our own.

Let's save motorsport in Calgary.  Let's do it by attending a race, going to a concert, or taking a winter driving course.  Let's talk about the great advantages available to us in a city with a track.

Remove me from your mailing list, this is an inappropriate use of my email address.  You may, however, contact me on a personal level to continue a person-to-person conversation on this matter.

  - Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: Rick Francescone <r.francescone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.ca>
Date: Sunday, October 17, 2010 12:37 am
Subject: Save Calgary Racing
To: r.francescone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.ca

> Dear Motorsport Enthusiasts
>
>  
>
> Over the past 3 years, the Calgary motorsport community has been
> threatenedwith the loss of Race City Motorsport Park. 
> Somewhere along the way, city
> administration lost sight of the fact that Race City is an
> important venue
> to maintain for Calgarians, and they made other plans for the
> city-owned
> land that Race City occupies.  By the time that these plans were
> communicated to Race City owner Art Mackenzie, the public, and
> city council,
> administration had progressed so far down this path that it
> seemed Race City
> was doomed.
>
>  
>
> The motorsports community has banded together through the Motorsports
> Council of Calgary to oppose the termination of the Race City
> lease with the
> City of Calgary.  We have so far received support from
> about half of the
> aldermen, led by alderman and now candidate for mayor, Ric McIvor.
>
> Council did not support a lease extension in Feb 2009, but Ric
> McIver tried
> again and on Sept 28 2009 city council directed city
> administration to work
> out a deal to extend the lease with Race City to 2015, which
> resulted in
> another two year deal (2010 - 2011).
>
>  
>
> It is important that we continue to support aldermanic
> candidates and a
> mayor that support Race City and/or motorsports in the City of
> Calgary.
>  
>
> This Monday October 18, we collectively have the opportunity to reach
> another milestone in the battle to maintain a motorsports venue
> in Calgary.
>
> Our research shows that we have the opportunity to elect a motorsport
> friendly City Council.  While we held a slim majority in
> the past, we were
> missing the most important part, a motorsports friendly mayor.
>
>  
>
> We urge you, and your family and friends to get out and Vote for
> Ric McIver
> for Mayor, and vote for the motorsport friendly Alderman that
> represents the
> ward you live in. Visit www.motorsportcouncilofcalgary.ca for
> further info.
>
>  
>
> The Aldermanic picks are as follows:
>
> Ward 1: Dale Hodges
>
> Ward 2: Joe Magliocca
>
> Ward 3: Jim Stevenson
>
> Ward 4: Brad Northcott
>
> Ward 5: Ray Jones
>
> Ward 6: Brent Mielke
>
> Ward 7: Kevin Taylor
>
> Ward 8: John Mar
>
> Ward 9: Mike Pal
>
> Ward 10: Andre Chabot
>
> Ward 11: James Maxim
>
> Ward 12: Roger Crowe
>
> Ward 13: Diane Colley-Urquhart
>
> Ward 14: Richard Dur
>
>  
>
> Your vote is important, and the future of motorsports in Calgary
> depends on
> it.
>
>  
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Motorsport Council of Calgary
>
>

Welcome

Change is the only constant.

Welcome to the semi-exciting new look, same crappy blogger.

All comments are still moderated, I'll approve everything that isn't spam or offensive.  Agreement with His Dorkasaurus is not necessary.

What has changed is that I don't have 1000 junk accounts clogging up the system that I have to go through one by one.  Yes, you too can set up an account and no longer need to wait for me to notice you posted.  Completely optional.

As always:  Have fun, be respectful.

Calendar

<<  October 2017  >>
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345

View posts in large calendar